LogoLogo
  • CHAOSS Community Handbook - Table of Contents
  • Handbook Usage
  • ABOUT
    • CHAOSS History
    • Values
    • Roadmap
    • Roles and Responsibilities
    • Community Guidelines
    • Path to Leadership
    • Terminology
      • CHAOSS Specific Terms
      • CHAOSS Committees
      • CHAOSS Community Working Group Terminology
      • CHAOSS Community Mentorship Terminology
    • Terminology Usage
    • General FAQ
  • COMMUNITY
    • Working Groups
      • WG Repository Structure
    • Metrics
      • Releases
      • Translation
      • Metrics FAQ
    • Community Report
    • CHAOSScon
    • CHAOSScast
    • CHAOSS Meetings
  • CONTRIBUTING
    • Development
      • Contributing Workflow
    • Documentation
      • Style Guide
    • Design
      • Design Workflow
      • Design Contribution
      • CHAOSS Visual Identity
    • Outreach
  • MENTORSHIPS
    • Google Summer of Code
    • Google Season of Docs
    • GSoC/GSoD Roles & Responsibilities
    • Outreachy
  • D&I BADGING
    • Overview of the D&I Badging
    • How to contribute
    • Apply for a badge
      • Apply for an In-Person Event
      • Apply for a Virtual Event
    • Reviewing for CHAOSS
      • Apply to Review
      • The Review Process
      • Conflict of Interest Policy
    • Badging Roles
      • Applicant
      • Reviewer
      • Moderator
      • Maintainer
    • The badging-bot
    • D&I Badging Code of Conduct
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • CHAOSS D&I Badging Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Statement

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. D&I BADGING
  2. Reviewing for CHAOSS

Conflict of Interest Policy

PreviousThe Review ProcessNextBadging Roles

Last updated 4 years ago

Was this helpful?

CHAOSS D&I Badging Conflict of Interest Policy

A conflict of interest in peer review arises when a situation where you, the reviewer, are unable to make a fair judgment. The CHAOSS D&I Badging Project aims to promote a transparent and impartial environment to evaluate Diversity and Inclusion, as well as consciously avoiding situations where conflicts of interest may appear.

As a reviewer, Conflicts of Interest for event submission reviews are your present or previous associations with any event organizers and the event committee of a submission. The following situations are considered conflicts and should be avoided:

  • Organizing for the submitted event.

  • Having a personal relationship (e.g.family, close friend) with the event organizer(s).

  • Receiving personal benefit resulting from the review.

  • Recent association (past year) with the same organization of an applicant, for example, being employed at the same institution.

If you have a conflict of interest with a submission, you should disclose the specific reason to the moderator team. After the discussion within the moderator team, you may not be eligible to review the submission. Declaring actual, perceived, and potential conflicts of interest are required under professional ethics. If in doubt, ask the moderators.

Statement

The D&I Conflict of Interest Policy is derived from and takes references from

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

JOSS Conflict of Interest Policy
Elsevier Conflict of Interest Policy.